Reliable Google Security-Operations-Engineer Practice Test & The Best Exams-boost - Leading Provider in Qualification Exams
The Google Cloud Certified - Professional Security Operations Engineer (PSOE) Exam (Security-Operations-Engineer) questions are in use by many customers currently, and they are preparing for their best future daily. Even the students who used it in the past to prepare for the Google Certification Exam have rated our practice questions as one of the best. You will receive updates till 365 days after your purchase, and there is a 24/7 support system that assists you whenever you are stuck in any problem or issues.
Google Security-Operations-Engineer Exam Syllabus Topics:
Topic
Details
Topic 1
Topic 2
Topic 3
>> Security-Operations-Engineer Practice Test <<
Security-Operations-Engineer Reliable Test Review | Exam Security-Operations-Engineer Format
First and foremost, even though our company has become the staunch force in this field for almost ten years and our Security-Operations-Engineer exam questions have enjoyed such a quick sale in the international market we still keep an affordable price for our customers. Second, we have prepared free demo in this website for our customers to have the first-hand experience of the Security-Operations-Engineer Latest Torrent compiled by our company before making their final decision. So do not hesitate any more, just hurry up to buy our Security-Operations-Engineer test question which will never let you down.
Google Cloud Certified - Professional Security Operations Engineer (PSOE) Exam Sample Questions (Q126-Q131):
NEW QUESTION # 126
You have a close relationship with a vendor who reveals to you privately that they have discovered a vulnerability in their web application that can be exploited in an XSS attack. This application is running on servers in the cloud and on-premises. Before the CVE is released, you want to look for signs of the vulnerability being exploited in your environment. What should you do?
Answer: A
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation
The correct solution is Option A. The key to this question is that the vulnerability is a zero-day (the CVE is not yet released). Therefore, you cannot hunt for known signatures, and tools that rely on public intelligence are useless. The only way to find it is to hunt for the behavior or TTPs (Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures) of its exploitation.
A critical XSS attack can often be used to achieve Remote Code Execution (RCE). The logical TTP for this would be:
* An external inbound connection to the web server (the exploit delivery).
* This connection causes the web server process to spawn a new subprocess (the payload, e.g., a reverse shell, whoami, or powershell.exe).
Option A perfectly describes a behavioral YARA-L rule to detect this exact time-ordered series of events.
By correlating an inbound NETWORK_CONNECTION with a subsequent PROCESS_LAUNCH from the same server and checking if that process is anomalous ("previously not seen"), you are effectively hunting for the post-exploitation behavior.
* Option B is incorrect: WSS is a vulnerability scanner that looks for known classes of vulnerabilities. It will not find a specific, unknown zero-day.
* Option C is incorrect: Gemini relies on public threat intelligence. If the CVE is not released, Gemini will not know about the vulnerability.
* Option D is incorrect: This is a generic C2 detection and is less specific than Option A. An exploit would also likely use low-prevalence or unusual binaries, not "high-prevalence" ones.
Exact Extract from Google Security Operations Documents:
YARA-L 2.0 language overview: YARA-L 2.0 is a computer language used to create rules for searching through your enterprise log data... A typical multiple event rule will have the following: A match section which specifies the time range over which events need to be grouped. A condition section specifying what condition should trigger the detection and checking for the existence of multiple events.
This allows an analyst to hunt for specific TTPs by correlating a time-ordered series of events. For example, a rule can be written to join a NETWORK_CONNECTION event (e.g., an external inbound connection) with a subsequent PROCESS_LAUNCH event on the same host... By enriching this with entity context, the detection can be scoped to trigger only when the spawned process is anomalous or previously not seen in the environment, indicating a likely post-exploitation activity, such as a web shell or remote code execution resulting from an exploit.
References:
Google Cloud Documentation: Google Security Operations > Documentation > Detections > Overview of the YARA-L 2.0 language Google Cloud Documentation: Google Security Operations > Documentation > Detections > Context-aware analytics
NEW QUESTION # 127
You are ingesting and parsing logs from an SSO provider and an on-premises appliance using Google Security Operations (SecOps). Users are tagged as "restricted" by an internal process. Restrictions last five days from the most recent flagging time. You need to create a rule to detect when restricted users log into the appliance. Your solution must be quickly implemented and easily maintained.
What should you do?
Answer: B
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed 150 to 250 words of Explanation From Exact Extract Google Security Operations Engineer documents:
This scenario is best addressed using Data Tables (formerly Reference Lists), which allow for dynamic list management with built-in expiration capabilities directly accessible by the Detection Engine.
According to Google Security Operations documentation regarding Data Tables: "Data tables are multicolumn data constructs that let you input your own data into Google Security Operations. They can act as lookup tables with defined columns and the data stored in rows." The prompt specifically requires handling a restriction period where "Restrictions last five days from the most recent flagging time." Data tables natively support this via Time-to-Live (TTL) settings. The documentation states: "You can specify a Time To Live (TTL) for list entries. When the TTL expires, the entry is automatically removed from the list." Furthermore, "TTL applied at the table level is inherited by the rows.
Any update to existing rows resets the TTL for that row," which perfectly automates the maintenance requirement.
To detect the login, you utilize row-based comparisons in YARA-L. The documentation explains the syntax for joining events with tables: "Using an equality operator ( =, != , >, >=, <, <= ) for row-based comparison.
For example, $udm_variable.field_path = %data_table_name.column_name." This allows the rule to dynamically check the incoming user against the active "restricted" list without modifying the rule text itself, ensuring the solution is easily maintained.
References: Google Security Operations Documentation > Investigation > Use data tables; Google Security Operations Documentation > Detection > YARA-L 2.0 Language Syntax
NEW QUESTION # 128
Your company is adopting a multi-cloud environment. You need to configure comprehensive monitoring of threats using Google Security Operations (SecOps). You want to start identifying threats as soon as possible. What should you do?
Answer: A
Explanation:
The fastest way to start monitoring threats in a multi-cloud environment using Google SecOps is to enable curated detections from the Cloud Threats category. These prebuilt detection rules provide immediate coverage for common cloud security threats across your environment, allowing you to identify and respond to incidents without waiting to develop custom rules.
NEW QUESTION # 129
An organization detects a successful login to a Google Cloud IAM user from an unfamiliar country, followed by the creation of multiple new service account keys within minutes. No malware alerts are triggered. What is the MOST appropriate immediate action?
Answer: C
Explanation:
Rapid creation of service account keys after anomalous login strongly indicates identity compromise. Immediate containment is required to prevent persistence and escalation.
NEW QUESTION # 130
Your organization has recently acquired Company A, which has its own SOC and security tooling. You have already configured ingestion of Company A's security telemetry and migrated their detection rules to Google Security Operations (SecOps). You now need to enable Company A's analysts to work their cases in Google SecOps. You need to ensure that Company A's analysts:
* do not have access to any case data originating from outside of Company A.
* are able to re-purpose playbooks previously developed by your organization's employees.
You need to minimize effort to implement your solution. What is the first step you should take?
Answer: C
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation
The correct solution is Option A. This scenario requires both data segregation (Requirement 1) and resource sharing (Requirement 2), which is the exact use case for Google SecOps SOAR "Environments." Google SecOps SOAR (formerly Siemplify) provides a multi-tenancy feature called Environments within a single SOAR tenant. This feature is designed for organizations that need to logically separate data and operations, such as for different business units, geographical regions, or, as in this case, a newly acquired company.
* Fulfills Requirement 1 (Data Segregation): Creating a new SOAR environment for Company A ensures that all their ingested alerts and generated cases are isolated within that environment. Analysts assigned only to Company A's environment will not be able to see cases or data from the parent organization's environment.
* Fulfills Requirement 2 (Playbook Sharing): Playbooks are managed at the global (tenant) level and can be shared or assigned across multiple environments. This allows Company A's analysts to access and re-purpose the pre-existing playbooks developed by the parent organization, minimizing rework.
* Fulfills Requirement 3 (Minimize Effort): This is the built-in, low-effort solution. In contrast, Option D (a second tenant) would be high-effort, costly, and would make sharing playbooks extremely difficult, as tenants are fully isolated. Option B (a new role) controls permissions (e.g., view, edit) but does not inherently segregate data access. Option C (a service account) is for programmatic API access, not for human analysts working in the UI.
Exact Extract from Google Security Operations Documents:
SOAR Environments: Google SecOps SOAR supports multi-tenancy through the use of Environments.6 Environments enable you to maintain data isolation between different logical entities (such as customers, departments, or business units) within the same SOAR instance.7 Each environment functions as a separate workspace, with its own set of cases, alerts, assets, and incident data. This ensures that users and teams operating in one environment cannot access or view data in another, unless they are explicitly granted permission.
Global Resources and Playbooks: While data such as cases is segregated by environment, key SOAR components like playbooks are managed at the global scope. This allows you to create, test, and manage playbooks centrally and then make them available for use across any or all of your environments. This capability enables resource re-use and standardization of response procedures, even in a multi-tenant configuration.
References:
Google Cloud Documentation: Google Security Operations > Documentation > SOAR > SOAR Administration > Environments Google Cloud Documentation: Google Security Operations > Documentation > SOAR > Playbooks > Playbook Management
NEW QUESTION # 131
......
If you find you are extra taxed please tell us in time before purchasing our Security-Operations-Engineer reliable Study Guide materials. Sometimes the key point is the information tax. Some countries may require buyers to pay extra information tax. How to avoid this tax while purchasing Google Security-Operations-Engineer Reliable Study Guide materials? You can choose to pay by PayPal with credit card. PayPal doesn't have extra costs. Here you don't need have a PayPal account; a credit card is the necessity for buying Security-Operations-Engineer reliable Study Guide.
Security-Operations-Engineer Reliable Test Review: https://www.exams-boost.com/Security-Operations-Engineer-valid-materials.html