Cost Effective DOP-C02 Dumps & Reliable DOP-C02 Study Notes
Nowadays, using computer-aided software to pass the DOP-C02 exam has become a new trend. Because the new technology enjoys a distinct advantage, that is convenient and comprehensive. In order to follow this trend, our company product such a DOP-C02 exam questions that can bring you the combination of traditional and novel ways of studying. The passing rate of our study material is up to 99%. If you are not fortune enough to acquire the DOP-C02 Certification at once, you can unlimitedly use our DOP-C02 product at different discounts until you reach your goal and let your dream comes true.
The Amazon DOP-C02 exam consists of 75 multiple-choice and multiple-response questions, and candidates are given 180 minutes to complete the exam. DOP-C02 exam covers a variety of topics, including automation and configuration management, monitoring and logging, security and compliance, and continuous delivery and deployment. Upon successful completion of the exam, candidates will be awarded the AWS Certified DevOps Engineer - Professional certification, which is valid for two years.
Amazon DOP-C02 Certification Exam is comprised of 75 multiple-choice and multiple-response questions, and the allotted time to complete the exam is 180 minutes. DOP-C02 exam fee is $300, and the test is available in English, Japanese, Korean, and Simplified Chinese. DOP-C02 exam is administered at a testing center or online, depending on the candidate's preference.
>> Cost Effective DOP-C02 Dumps <<
Reliable DOP-C02 Study Notes, DOP-C02 Valid Test Papers
The DOP-C02 quiz torrent we provide is compiled by experts with profound experiences according to the latest development in the theory and the practice so they are of great value. Please firstly try out our product before you decide to buy our product. It is worthy for you to buy our DOP-C02 Exam Preparation not only because it can help you pass the exam successfully but also because it saves your time and energy. Your satisfactions are our aim of the service and please take it easy to buy our DOP-C02 quiz torrent.
To earn the certification, candidates must demonstrate their ability to design and manage continuous delivery systems and methodologies on AWS, implement and automate security controls, deploy and operate highly available, scalable, and fault-tolerant systems, and monitor and log systems to ensure operational availability and performance.
Amazon AWS Certified DevOps Engineer - Professional Sample Questions (Q258-Q263):
NEW QUESTION # 258
A company recently launched multiple applications that use Application Load Balancers. Application response time often slows down when the applications experience problems A DevOps engineer needs to Implement a monitoring solution that alerts the company when the applications begin to perform slowly The DevOps engineer creates an Amazon Simple Notification Semce (Amazon SNS) topic and subscribe the company's email address to the topic What should the DevOps engineer do next to meet the requirements?
Answer: D
Explanation:
* Option A is incorrect because creating an Amazon EventBridge rule that invokes an AWS Lambda function to query the applications on a 5-minute interval is not a valid solution. EventBridge rules can only trigger Lambda functions based on events, not on time intervals. Moreover, querying the applications on a 5-minute interval might incur unnecessary costs and network overhead, and might not detect performance issues in real time.
* Option B is correct because creating an Amazon CloudWatch Synthetics canary that runs a custom script to query the applications on a 5-minute interval is a valid solution. CloudWatch Synthetics canaries are configurable scripts that monitor endpoints and APIs by simulating customer behavior.
Canaries can run as often as once per minute, and can measure the latency and availability of theapplications. Canaries can also send notifications to an Amazon SNS topic when they detect errors or performance issues1.
* Option C is incorrect because creating an Amazon CloudWatch alarm that uses the AWS
/ApplicationELB namespace RequestCountPerTarget metric is not a valid solution. The RequestCountPerTarget metric measures the number of requests completed or connections made per target in a target group2. This metric does not reflect the application response time, which is the requirement. Moreover, configuring the CloudWatch alarm to send a notification when the number of connections becomes greater than the configured number of threads that the application supports is not a valid way to measure the application performance, as it depends on the application design and implementation.
* Option D is incorrect because creating an Amazon CloudWatch alarm that uses the AWS
/ApplicationELB namespace RequestCountPerTarget metric is not a valid solution, for the same reason as option C. The RequestCountPerTarget metric does not reflect the application response time, which is the requirement. Moreover, configuring the CloudWatch alarm to send a notification when the average response time becomes greater than the longest response time that the application supports is not a valid way to measure the application performance, as it does not account for variability or outliers in the response time distribution.
References:
* 1: Using synthetic monitoring
* 2: Application Load Balancer metrics
NEW QUESTION # 259
A company sells products through an ecommerce web application The company wants a dashboard that shows a pie chart of product transaction details. The company wants to integrate the dashboard With the companfs existing Amazon CloudWatch dashboards Which solution Will meet these requirements With the MOST operational effictency?
Answer: D
Explanation:
The correct answer is A.
A comprehensive and detailed explanation is:
Option A is correct because it meets the requirements with the most operational efficiency. Updating the ecommerce application to emit a JSON object to a CloudWatch log group for each processed transaction is a simple and cost-effective way to collect the data needed for the dashboard. Using CloudWatch Logs Insights to query the log group and to visualize the results in a pie chart format is also a convenient and integrated solution that leverages the existing CloudWatch dashboards. Attaching the results to the desired CloudWatch dashboard is straightforward and does not require any additional steps or services.
Option B is incorrect because it introduces unnecessary complexity and cost. Updating the ecommerce application to emit a JSON object to an Amazon S3 bucket for each processed transaction is a valid way to store the data, but it requires creating and managing an S3 bucket and its permissions. Using Amazon Athena to query the S3 bucket and to visualize the results in a pie chart format is also a valid way to analyze the data, but it incurs charges based on the amount of data scanned by each query. Exporting the results from Athena and attaching them to the desired CloudWatch dashboard is also an extra step that adds more overhead and latency.
Option C is incorrect because it uses AWS X-Ray for an inappropriate purpose. Updating the ecommerce application to use AWS X-Ray for instrumentation is a good practice for monitoring and tracing distributed applications, but it is not designed for aggregating product transaction details. Creating a new X-Ray subsegment and adding an annotation for each processed transaction is possible, but it would clutter the X-Ray service map and make it harder to debug performance issues. Using X-Ray traces to query the data and to visualize the results in a pie chart format is also possible, but it would require custom code and logic that are not supported by X-Ray natively. Attaching the results to the desired CloudWatch dashboard is also not supported by X-Ray directly, and would require additional steps or services.
Option D is incorrect because it introduces unnecessary complexity and cost. Updating the ecommerce application to emit a JSON object to a CloudWatch log group for each processed transaction is a simple and cost-effective way to collect the data needed for the dashboard, as in option A) However, creating an AWS Lambda function to aggregate and write the results to Amazon DynamoDB is redundant, as CloudWatch Logs Insights can already perform aggregation queries on log data. Creating a Lambda subscription filter for the log file is also redundant, as CloudWatch Logs Insights can already access log data directly. Attaching the results to the desired CloudWatch dashboard would also require additional steps or services, as DynamoDB does not support native integration with CloudWatch dashboards.
Reference:
CloudWatch Logs Insights
Amazon Athena
AWS X-Ray
AWS Lambda
Amazon DynamoDB
NEW QUESTION # 260
A company has an application that includes AWS Lambda functions. The Lambda functions run Python code that is stored in an AWS CodeCommit repository. The company has recently experienced failures in the production environment because of an error in the Python code. An engineer has written unit tests for the Lambda functions to help avoid releasing any future defects into the production environment.
The company's DevOps team needs to implement a solution to integrate the unit tests into an existing AWS CodePipeline pipeline. The solution must produce reports about the unit tests for the company to view.
Which solution will meet these requirements?
Answer: D
Explanation:
The correct answer is B. Creating a new AWS CodeBuild project and configuring a test stage in the AWS CodePipeline pipeline that uses the new CodeBuild project is the best way to integrate the unit tests into the existing pipeline. Creating a CodeBuild report group and uploading the test reports to the new CodeBuild report group will produce reports about the unit tests for the company to view. Using JUNITXML as the output format for the unit tests is supported by CodeBuild and will generate a valid report.
Option A is incorrect because Amazon CodeGuru Reviewer is a service that provides automated code reviews and recommendations for improving code quality and performance. It is not a tool for running unit tests or producing test reports. Therefore, option A will not meet the requirements.
Option C is incorrect because AWS CodeArtifact is a service that provides secure, scalable, and cost-effective artifact management for software development. It is not a tool for running unit tests or producing test reports. Moreover, option C uses CUCUMBERJSON as the output format for the unit tests, which is not supported by CodeBuild and will not generate a valid report.
Option D is incorrect because uploading the test reports to an Amazon S3 bucket is not the best way to produce reports about the unit tests for the company to view. CodeBuild has a built-in feature to create and manage test reports, which is more convenient and efficient than using S3. Furthermore, option D uses HTML as the output format for the unit tests, which is not supported by CodeBuild and will not generate a valid report.
NEW QUESTION # 261
A company needs a strategy for failover and disaster recovery of its data and application. The application uses a MySQL database and Amazon EC2 instances. The company requires a maximum RPO of 2 hours and a maximum RTO of 10 minutes for its data and application at all times.
Which combination of deployment strategies will meet these requirements? (Select TWO.)
Answer: A,D
Explanation:
Verified answer: B and E
Short To meet the requirements of failover and disaster recovery, the company should use the following deployment strategies:
Create an Amazon Aurora global database in two AWS Regions as the data store. In the event of a failure, promote the secondary Region to the primary for the application. Update the application to use the Aurora cluster endpoint in the secondary Region. This strategy can provide a low RPO and RTO for the data, as Aurora global database replicates data with minimal latency across Regions and allows fast and easy failover12. The company can use the Amazon Aurora cluster endpoint to connect to the current primary DB cluster without needing to change any application code1.
Set up the application in two AWS Regions. Configure AWS Global Accelerator to point to Application Load Balancers (ALBs) in both Regions. Add both ALBs to a single endpoint group. Use health checks and Auto Scaling groups in each Region. This strategy can provide high availability and performance for the application, as AWS Global Accelerator uses the AWS global network to route traffic to the closest healthy endpoint3. The company can also use static IP addresses that are assigned by Global Accelerator as a fixed entry point for their application1. By using health checks and Auto Scaling groups, the company can ensure that their application can scale up or down based on demand and handle any instance failures4.
The other options are incorrect because:
Creating an Amazon Aurora Single-AZ cluster in multiple AWS Regions as the data store would not provide a fast failover or disaster recovery solution, as the company would need to manually restore data from backups or snapshots in another Region in case of a failure.
Creating an Amazon Aurora cluster in multiple AWS Regions as the data store and using a Network Load Balancer to balance the database traffic in different Regions would not work, as Network Load Balancers do not support cross-Region routing. Moreover, this strategy would not provide a consistent view of the data across Regions, as Aurora clusters do not replicate data automatically between Regions unless they are part of a global database.
Setting up the application in two AWS Regions and using Amazon Route 53 failover routing that points to Application Load Balancers in both Regions would not provide a low RTO, as Route 53 failover routing relies on DNS resolution, which can take time to propagate changes across different DNS servers and clients. Moreover, this strategy would not provide deterministic routing, as Route 53 failover routing depends on DNS caching behavior, which can vary depending on different factors.
NEW QUESTION # 262
A company has an application that runs on AWS Lambda and sends logs to Amazon CloudWatch Logs. An Amazon Kinesis data stream is subscribed to the log groups in CloudWatch Logs. A single consumer Lambda function processes the logs from the data stream and stores the logs in an Amazon S3 bucket.
The company's DevOps team has noticed high latency during the processing and ingestion of some logs.
Which combination of steps will reduce the latency? (Select THREE.)
Answer: A,B,D
Explanation:
The latency in processing and ingesting logs can be caused by several factors, such as the throughput of the Kinesis data stream, the concurrency of the Lambda function, and the configuration of the event source mapping. To reduce the latency, the following steps can be taken:
Create a data stream consumer with enhanced fan-out. Set the Lambda function that processes the logs as the consumer. This will allow the Lambda function to receive records from the data stream with dedicated throughput of up to 2 MB per second per shard, independent of other consumers1. This will reduce the contention and delay in accessing the data stream.
Increase the ParallelizationFactor setting in the Lambda event source mapping. This will allow the Lambda service to invoke more instances of the function concurrently to process the records from the data stream2. This will increase the processing capacity and reduce the backlog of records in the data stream.
Configure reserved concurrency for the Lambda function that processes the logs. This will ensure that the function has enough concurrency available to handle the increased load from the data stream3. This will prevent the function from being throttled by the account-level concurrency limit.
The other options are not effective or may have negative impacts on the latency. Option D is not suitable because increasing the batch size in the Kinesis data stream will increase the amount of data that the Lambda function has to process in each invocation, which may increase the execution time and latency4. Option E is not advisable because turning off the ReportBatchItemFailures setting in the Lambda event source mapping will prevent the Lambda service from retrying the failed records, which may result in data loss. Option F is not necessary because increasing the number of shards in the Kinesis data stream will increase the throughput of the data stream, but it will not affect the processing speed of the Lambda function, which is the bottleneck in this scenario.
Reference:
1: Using AWS Lambda with Amazon Kinesis Data Streams - AWS Lambda
2: AWS Lambda event source mappings - AWS Lambda
3: Managing concurrency for a Lambda function - AWS Lambda
4: AWS Lambda function scaling - AWS Lambda
5: AWS Lambda event source mappings - AWS Lambda
6: Scaling Amazon Kinesis Data Streams with AWS CloudFormation - Amazon Kinesis Data Streams
NEW QUESTION # 263
......
Reliable DOP-C02 Study Notes: https://www.itpassleader.com/Amazon/DOP-C02-dumps-pass-exam.html