ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Training Materials & ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Dumps PDF & ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Cram
Our company’s top ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor exam braindumps are meant to deliver you the best knowledge on this subject. If you study with our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor study guide, you will find that not only you can get the most professional and specialized skills to solve the problems in you dialy work, but also you can pass the exam without difficulty and achieve the certification. What is more, the prices of our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor training engine are quite favorable.
PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Syllabus Topics:
Topic
Details
Topic 1
Topic 2
Topic 3
Topic 4
>> ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Reliable Test Testking <<
ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam sure torrent & ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor valid training & ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam test pdf
With our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor practice materials, and your persistence towards success, you can be optimistic about your ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor real dumps. Even you have bought our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor learning braindumps, and we will send the new updates to you one year long. On one hand, all content can radically give you the best backup to make progress. On the other hand, our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Questions are classy and can broaden your preview potentially. Their efficiency has far beyond your expectation!
PECB ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam Sample Questions (Q71-Q76):
NEW QUESTION # 71
What certification recommendation did the auditee receive?
Scenario 8: VeridicAI. based in San Francisco. USA, specializes in market research using Al technologies to analyze customer behavior. Founded in 2023, the company employs natural language processing, machine learning, and predictive analytics to provide real time insights to a range of businesses. VeridicAI has implemented an artificial intelligence management system AIMS based on ISO/IEC 42001 to manage its Al technologies effectively. The AIMS scope includes select departments within the company, for which it has received a four-year certification against ISO/IEC 42001. Committed to transparency. VeridicAI publicly shares details of this certification.
As the certification nears its end, VeridicAI is preparing for an audit to renew its certification.
The audit process was led by Sharona, the audit team leader, who is a full-time employee of the certification body. Sharona and the audit team undertook all planned audit activities. Afterward, they organized the closing meeting with VeridicAl's management. During the meeting, Sharona and the team made a recap on audit objectives and scope, presented the audit findings and conclusions, presented identified nonconformities, and organized a session for questions and answers for the auditee.
VeridicAI received a conditional recommendation for certification, underscoring its compliance with the industry's standards. Sharona confirmed that the company met the essential requirements but noted some identified minor nonconformities. In response, VeridicAI compiled and submitted a comprehensive action plan that addresses all identified nonconformities within a designated timeframe. Because of the comprehensive action plan, Sharona did not see the need for an additional on- site visit to verify the effectiveness of the action plan.
Sharona played an integral role in the certification decision process. Her thorough understanding of VeridicAI's operations, gained from the audit, guided the certification body towards a well-informed certification decision.
Answer: B
Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 42001:2023 and auditing best practices as per ISO 19011:2018 guidelines, a conditional certification may be issued when an organization conforms to most of the requirements but has minor nonconformities that do not pose a major risk to the system's effectiveness. In this case, VeridicAI received a conditional recommendation based on minor nonconformities. They submitted a comprehensive action plan, and the audit leader decided no additional on-site visit was necessary.
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 refers to such decisions under Clause 9.5 (Improvement), which supports corrective actions based on minor issues without necessarily requiring physical validation if the evidence submitted is sufficient.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 9.5 - Nonconformity and Corrective Action
ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 - Requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems ISO 19011:2018 Clause 6.4.10 - Audit Conclusion and Recommendation
===========
NEW QUESTION # 72
Scenario 9:
Scenario 9: Securisai, located in Tallinn.Estonia, specializes in the development of automated cybersecurity solutions that utilize AIsystems. The company recently implemented an artificial intelligence management system AIMS in accordance with ISO/IEC 42001. Indoing so, the company aimed to manage its Al-driven systems' capabilities to detect and mitigate cyber threats more efficiently andethically. As part of its commitment to upholding the highest standards of Al use and management, Securisai underwent a certificationaudit to demonstrate compliance with ISO/IEC 42001.
The audit process comprised two main stages: the initial or stage 1 audit focused on reviewing Securisai's documentation, policies, andprocedures related to its AIMS. This review laid the groundwork for the stage 2 audit, which involved a comprehensive, on-site evaluation of the actual implementation and effectiveness of the AIMS within Securisai's operations. The goal was to observe the AIMS in operation,ensuring that it not only existed on paper but was effectively integrated into the company's daily activities and cybersecurity strategies.
After the audit, Roger, Securisai's internal auditor, addressed the action plans devised to rectify nonconformities identified during thecertification audit. He developed a long term strategy, highlighting key AIMS processes for triennial audits. Roger's internal audits play a key role in advancing Securisai's goals by employing a systematic and disciplined method to assess and boost the efficiency of risk management, governance processes, and strategic decision-making. Roger reported his findings directly to Securisai's top management.
Following the successful rectification of nonconformities, Securisai was officially certified against ISO/IEC
42001.
Recently, the company decided to transfer its ISO/IEC 42001 certification registration from one certification body to another despitebeing initially bound by a long-term agreement with the current certification body.
This decision was motivated by the desire to partnerwith a certification body that offers deeper insights and expertise in the rapidly evolving field of artificial intelligence in cybersecurity.
To ensure a smooth transition and uphold its certification status, Securisai is diligently compiling the required documentation forsubmission to the new certification body. This includes a formal request, the most recent audit report underscoring its adherence toISO/IEC 42001, the latest corrective action plan that highlights its continuous efforts toward improvement, and a copy of its current validcertification registration.
A year following Securisai's initial certification audit, a subsequent audit was carried out by the certification body on its AIMS. The purpose of this audit was to assess compliance with ISO/IEC 42001 and verify the ongoing improvement of the AIMS. The audit team concluded that Securisai's AIMS consistently meets the requirements set by ISO/IEC 42001.
During an AIMS audit at a cybersecurity company, the team found a major nonconformity - ineffective access controls for sensitive data.
Question:
Given this situation, what is the appropriate next step?
Answer: A
Explanation:
Major nonconformities require follow-upbefore recommending certification.
* ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.4.9.4requires that for major nonconformities:"Certification shall only be granted after verification of the effective implementation of corrective actions, typically through an on-site follow-up audit."
* Immediate revocation or full re-audit is not necessary unless systemic failure is evident.
Reference:ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.4.9.4; ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 10.2.
NEW QUESTION # 73
Audit evidence must be:
Answer: B
Explanation:
Audit evidencemust beobjective and verifiable, meaning that it can beconfirmed through observation, documentation, or reproducible results. This is a foundational principle of auditing as per:
* ISO 19011:2018 - Clause 3.8defines audit evidence as "records, statements of fact or other information which arerelevant to the audit criteria and verifiable."
* This principle is also emphasized in ISO/IEC 42001 during internal audits (Clause 9.2), ensuring that conclusions are based onfactual, traceable, and confirmabledata.
Verifiability ensures the credibility and reliability of audit findings, especially critical in evaluating AIMS due to the complexity and potential subjectivity of AI behaviors.
Reference: ISO 19011:2018 - Clause 3.8; Principle of evidence-based approach ISO/IEC 42001:2023 - Clause 9.2.2 (Internal audit process) PECB Lead Auditor Guide - Domain 3: "Audit Evidence and Findings"
NEW QUESTION # 74
A company develops an AI-based health monitoring system that provides insights and recommendations to users. However, users have reported that they do not understand how the system arrives at its recommendations. Which core element should the company enhance to improve user trust and understanding?
Answer: D
Explanation:
The issue in this case revolves aroundusers not understanding the reasoning or logicbehind the AI- generated recommendations. The relevant core element isTransparency and Explainability.
According toISO/IEC 42001:2023 - Clause 6.1.2 and Clause 8.2.3, transparency refers to theclarity of processes, decisions, and data use, while explainability focuses on makingAI system outputs understandableto human users.
ThePECB Lead Auditor Guideidentifies this as a key factor in buildingtrust, usability, and ethical AI adoption, especially insensitive domainslike healthcare.
Reference: ISO/IEC 42001:2023 - Clause 6.1.2 (Risk and impact assessment), Clause 8.2.3 (Controls related to operational use) PECB Lead Auditor Guide - Domain 1: "Transparency and Explainability" in AI Ethics
NEW QUESTION # 75
Scenario 2 (continued):
Empsy HR Solutions is a human resources consulting company that provides innovative HR solutions to diverse industries.Recognizing the significant impact of artificial intelligence Al in HR processes, including its ability to automate repetitive tasks, analyzevast amounts of data for insights, improve recruitment and talent management strategies, and personalize employee experiences, thecompany has initiated the implementation of an artificial intelligence management system AIMS based on ISO/IEC 42001.
Initially, the top management established an Al policy that was aligned with the company's objectives. The Al policy provided a frameworkfor defining Al objectives, a commitment to meeting relevant requirements, and a dedication to continually improve the AIMS. However, it did not refer to other organizational policies, although some were relevant to the AIMS. Afterward, the top management documented thepolicy, communicated it internally, and made it accessible to interested parties.
The top management designated specific individuals to ensure that the AIMS meets the standard's requirements. Additionally, theyensured that these individuals were responsible for overseeing theAIMS, reporting its performance to the top management, andfacilitating continual improvement. Moreover, in its awareness sessions, the company focused exclusively on ensuring that all personnel were informed about the Al policy, emphasizing their role in ensuring the effectiveness of the AIMS and the benefits of enhanced Alperformance.
The company also planned, implemented, and monitored processes to meet AIMS requirements. Additionally, it set clear criteria andimplemented controls based on them, ensuring effective operation, alignment with organizational objectives, and continual improvement.Empsy HR Solutions decided to implement strict measures to control changes to documented information within the AIMS. To ensure theintegrity and accuracy of documentation, the company adopted version control practices. Each document update was tracked using aversioning system, with clear records of what was modified, who made the changes, and when the updates occurred. Access to makechanges was restricted to authorized personnel, and any proposed modifications required approval from the designated managementteam before being implemented.
Moreover, considering past experiences where the company encountered unforeseen risks, Empsy HR Solutions established acomprehensive Al risk assessment process. This process involved identifying, analyzing, and evaluating Al risks to determine if it isnecessary to implement additional controls than those specified in Annex A. The company also referred to Annex B for guidance onimplementing controls and, ultimately, produced a Statement of Applicability SoA. The SoA contained the necessary controls, including allthe controls of Annex A and justifications for their inclusion or exclusion.
Lastly. Empsy HR Solutions decided to establish an internal audit program to ensure the AIMS conforms to both the company'srequirements and ISO/IEC 42001. It defined the audit objectives, criteria, and scope for each audit, selected auditors, and ensuredobjectivity and impartiality during the audit process. The results of the first audit were documented and reported only to the top management of the company.
Question:
Based on Scenario 2, was the awareness session conducted in accordance with the requirements of Clause 7.3 Awareness of ISO/IEC 42001?
Answer: B
Explanation:
ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 7.3 requires that awareness training should not only inform employees about the AI policy and roles but alsocommunicate the implications of nonconformancewith AIMS requirements. Since Empsy HR Solutions missed this, it is non-compliant.
Reference:ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 7.3 (Awareness).
NEW QUESTION # 76
......
Only high-quality and high-precision ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor qualification question can enable learners to be confident to take the qualification examination, and our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor learning materials are such high-quality learning materials, it can meet the user to learn the most popular test site knowledge. Because our experts have extracted the frequent annual test centers are summarized to provide users. Only excellent learning materials such as our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Study Tool can meet the needs of the majority of candidates, and now you should make the most decision is to choose our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor exam questions.
ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Reliable Exam Prep: https://www.passleader.top/PECB/ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor-exam-braindumps.html