ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor試験の準備方法｜最新のISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditorコンポーネント試験｜権威のあるISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam参考資料
我々のPECBのISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditorソフトはあなたのすべての需要を満たすのを希望します。問題集の全面性と権威性、PECBのISO-IEC-42001-Lead-AuditorソフトがPDF版、オンライン版とソフト版があるという資料のバーションの多様性、購入の前にデモの無料ダウンロード、購入の後でPECBのISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditorソフトの一年間の無料更新、これ全部は我々の誠の心を示しています。
現在の市場では、ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor最新の質問のようなISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor試験の準備に使用される有効なISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor学習教材を購入するのは困難です。国内および国際市場での人気と品質自体の両方で、他の種類の教材はISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditorテストガイドと比較できず、はるかに劣っています。 ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor認定ツールには、国内市場に独自の固定クライアントベースがあり、国際市場で重要なシェアを持ち、ますます多くの外国クライアントを引き付けています。
>> ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditorコンポーネント <<
ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor参考資料 & ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor試験概要
多くの候補者は実際の戦闘経験がないため、資格試験は初めて参加するため、テストPECB認定を取得する方法については、一連の方法を所有していませんでした。値がありません。 ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor試験の練習では、受験者の興味や趣味に応じて、コンテンツと形式を高効率かつ正確に配置できるというメリットを享受することができます。忠実な顧客からの多くの感謝のフィードバックは、ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor準備の質問を提供するこの分野で最も人気のあるベンダーであることを証明しました。
PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor 認定試験の出題範囲：
トピック
出題範囲
トピック 1
トピック 2
トピック 3
トピック 4
トピック 5
トピック 6
PECB ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam 認定 ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor 試験問題 (Q130-Q135):
質問 # 130
Question:
Who is responsible for reviewing the corrections, identified causes, and corrective actions of the auditee?
正解：C
解説：
Thecertification bodyhas the ultimate responsibility forreviewing and verifyingcorrective actions after an audit.
* ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.4.9states:"The certification body shall review the correction, cause analysis, and corrective actions proposed by the client."
* Although the audit team may assist, responsibility lies with the certification body for ensuring compliance before issuing or maintaining certification.
Reference:ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.4.9; ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Auditor Guide Section 8 ("Post-Audit Responsibilities").
質問 # 131
A software development company is well-known for its innovative practices and collaborative work environment. The CEO, Alex, has fostered a work culture where team input is highly valued in shaping the company's strategic direction. Alex often organizes brainstorming sessions and workshops, inviting employees from various departments to share their insights and suggestions on new projects, company policies, and workflow improvements. While Alex ensures that every team member feels heard and valued, the final decisions on project directions, key company policies, and strategic initiatives rest with Alex. Which type of leadership does Alex most closely embody?
正解：D
解説：
This leadership style aligns most closely with democratic leadership. Democratic leaders engage their team in decision-making, encourage participation, and value input from all levels of the organization - while retaining final authority over decisions. In the scenario, Alex empowers employees to contribute but maintains control over strategic decisions, which is characteristic of democratic leadership.
Autocratic = Top-down decisions without consultation
Laissez-faire = Minimal direction or involvement
Bureaucratic = Rigid adherence to rules and hierarchy
Reference:
ISO/IEC 42001:2023, Clause 5.1 - Leadership and Commitment
PECB ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Auditor Guide - Section: Leadership and Culture in AIMS Certainly! Below are the answers to Questions 61 through 63, formatted according to your requested structure with comprehensive explanations and references to ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO 19011:2018, and the PECB ISO
/IEC 42001 Lead Auditor Study Guide.
-
質問 # 132
Samuel reviewed and approved the audit plan. Is this acceptable? Refer to Scenario 6.
Scenario 6: AfrinovAl, based in Nairobi, Kenya, develops Al tools to improve agriculture in Africa. The company uses Al to address challenges faced by African farmers, offering tools for analyzing satellite images to monitor crop health, predicting pest and disease outbreaks, and automating irrigation to use water more efficiently.
AfrinovAl has implemented an artificial intelligence management system AIMS based on ISO/IEC 42001, reflecting its commitment to ethical and effective management practices in its Al solutions.
AfrinovAl is undergoing a certification audit to obtain certification against ISO/IEC 42001. Samuel, an expert in Al technologies and management systems, is heading the audit team. Before initiating the audit process, Samuel reviewed and approved the audit plan, which served as a basis for the agreement between the certification body and the auditee.
During the stage 1 audit, the audit team focused on a detailed evaluation of AfrinovAI's documented information, critically assessing both their format and content.
Samuel held a meeting with his team to prepare for the stage 2 audit. During this meeting, responsibilities were allocated among team members, assigning specific processes, functions, sites, areas, or activities based on each auditor's expertise and the audit requirements. He also assigned auditing roles to technical experts to leverage their specialized knowledge in specific areas.
In the stage 2 audit, Samuel and his team held an opening meeting during which Samuel explained how the audit activities will be undertaken. AfrinovAI's also participated in the meeting. Afterward, the audit team conducted on-site activities to closely inspect the physical locations of the audited processes. The interviewed individuals from the auditee's personnel regarding the AIMS and observed some of the operations of the auditee. They also used sampling and technical verification to assess the implementation of Al-related controls, verify compliance with established procedures, and identify any gaps in adherence to the AIMS requirements. They skipped the review of documented information related to the AIMS since some documents had already been reviewed during the stage 1 audit. This comprehensive approach ensured a thorough evaluation of AfrinovAI's AIMS against the ISO/IEC 42001.
正解：B
解説：
According to ISO 19011:2018 (Clause 6.4.3), the audit team leader is responsible for preparing, reviewing, and approving the audit plan. The plan must then be communicated to the auditee, and its execution should align with the objectives, scope, and criteria of the audit.
In Scenario 6, Samuel fulfilled this responsibility correctly by reviewing and approving the plan before the audit began.
Reference:
ISO 19011:2018, Clause 6.4.3 - Preparing the Audit Plan
ISO/IEC 42001:2023, Clause 9.2 - Responsibilities in Audit Planning
PECB ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Auditor Study Guide - Audit Planning and Approval Process
質問 # 133
Which control in Annex A emphasizes the importance of security measures in AI system operations?
正解：D
解説：
Annex A of ISO/IEC 42001:2023providesreference controlsto support operational and ethical AI governance. The control that emphasizessecurity in AI system operationsis:A.8.2.2 - Access Control: This control requires thatonly authorized individuals or systemscan access, modify, or influence the AI system, ensuringdata integrity and protectionof critical operations.
Access control is afoundational security controlused to prevent unauthorized interference or manipulation of AI behavior or data pipelines.
Reference: ISO/IEC 42001:2023 - Annex A, Control A.8.2.2 (Access Control) PECB Lead Auditor Guide - Domain 2: "Security and Trust Controls for AI"
質問 # 134
Scenario 6 (continued):
Scenario 6: HappilyAI is a pioneering enterprise dedicated to developing and deploying artificial intelligence Al solutions tailored toenhance customer service experiences across various industries. The company offers innovative products like virtual assistants,predictive analytics tools, and personalized customer interaction platforms. As part of its commitment to operational excellence andinnovation, HappilyAI has implemented a robust Al management system AIMS to oversee its Al operations effectively. Currently.HappilyAI is undergoing a comprehensive audit process of its AIMS to evaluate its compliance with ISO/IEC 42001.
Under the leadership of Jess, the audit team began the audit process with meticulous planning and coordination, setting the groundworkfor the extensive on-site activities of the stage 1 audit. This initial phase was marked by a comprehensive documentation review. Theaudit scope encompassed a critical review of HappilyAI's core departments, including Research and Development (R&D), CustomerService, and Data Security, aiming to assess the conformity of HappilyAI's AIMS to the requirements of ISO/IEC 42001.
Afterward, Jess and the team conducted a formal opening meeting with HappilyAI to introduce the audit team and outline the auditactivities. The meeting set a collaborative tone for the subsequent phases, where the team engaged in information collection, executedaudit tests, identified findings, and prepared draft nonconformity reports while maintaining a strict quality review process.
In gathering evidence, the audit team employed a sampling method, which involved dividing the population into homogeneous groups toensure a comprehensive and representative data collection by drawing samples from each segment. Furthermore, the team employedobservation to deepen their understanding of the Al management processes. They verified the availability of essential documentation,including Al-related policies, and evaluated the communication channels established for reporting incidents.
Additionally, they scrutinized specific monitoring tools designed to track the performance of data acquisition processes, ensuring thesetools effectively identify and respond to errors or anomalies. However, a notable challenge emerged as the team encountered a lack ofaccess to documented information that describes how tasks about AIMS are executed. In addition to this, the team identified a potentialnonconformity within the Sales Department. They decided not to record this as a nonconformity in the audit report but onlycommunicated it to the HappilyAI's representatives.
During the stage 2 audit, the certification body, in collaboration with HappilyAI, assigned the roles of technical experts within the auditteam. Recognized for their specialized knowledge and expertisein artificial intelligence and its applications, these technical experts aretasked with the thorough assessment of the AIMS framework to ensure its alignment with industry standards and best practices,focusing on areas such as data ethics, algorithmic transparency, and Al system security.
Question:
During the stage 2 audit, the certification body and the company assigned the roles of technical experts. Is this acceptable?
正解：C
解説：
It isacceptableif thecertification body and auditee agreeon the technical experts' roles.
* ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.1.9states:"The role and involvement of technical experts must be planned and agreed between the certification body and auditee prior to their participation."
* TheLead Auditor Manualreinforces:"Technical experts provide specialized knowledge, but their roles must be coordinated through mutual agreement between certification bodies and auditees." Reference:ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.1.9; ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 9.2.2.
質問 # 135
......
あなたが信じる信じられないのを問わず、我々の権威的なPECBのISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor試験のための資料がここにあります。あなたにPECBのISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor試験準備の最高のヘルプを提供します。PECBのISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor試験に合格すればあなたのプロモーションの夢が叶えるかもしれません。私たちは、衝動買いは後悔することは容易であることを知っていますから、あなたはご購入の前にやってみるのを薦めます。PECBのISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor試験のデモを我々ウェブサイトで無料でダウンロードできて、早く体験しましょう。
ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor参考資料: https://jp.fast2test.com/ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor-premium-file.html